Portions of this column were originally written for the September 2004 edition of News Photographer Magazine.
Mark Loundy is a media producer and consultant based in San Jose, California. Full bio.
The opinions in this article are those of the author alone and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Press Photographers Association.
By Mark Loundy
"And the category is..."
This month it's potpourri...
Do you still doubt that photographers are disrespected? According to a report from a New York Times picture editor, the company's corporate attitude toward freelancers is that the current crop of photographers will retire or otherwise leave the business and that the new generation will be more amenable to their demands. In other words, they're waiting for the knowledgeable ones to die and hoping that the new crop of freelancers will fail to educate themselves about prudent business practices. I think the Times is in for a very long wait.
Try to catch yourself when you refer to what you do as "selling" your images. Independent photographers "license" limited usage rights to their images. I know it's commonly used shorthand, but it creates a subconscious impression in the minds of clients and in our own minds that we deal in a cookie-cutter commodity. There's enough of that going on in the offices of media management.
One well-respected intellectual property attorney tells me that using the term "sold" in your paperwork can potentially cost you thousands of dollars in the event of a dispute.
We need to resist the commoditization of our profession and the devaluing of individual photographic skills on every level.
The operators of the We Support U website who pulled their unpermissioned newsphoto-laden site after their copyright infringements were brought to their attention. If you have images of currently-deployed U.S. servicepeople, give them a visit. You might want to donate some usage rights to somebody who's trying to do the right thing.
HBO's Work-for-hire contract.
The Journal-Register Company for recently stripping its staff photographers of their cut of print sales. They must have mistaken their staff shooters for freelancers.
Talk about cheap! The Maryland-Delaware region of the Associated Press recently instituted a $50 award for the best monthly photo and then using the award as a the reason for cutting the amount paid for member submissions from $25 to $10. What? Were they only getting 10 submissions a month?
UPI for its one-year exclusive rights followed by a perpetual non-exclusive rights contract.
Please let me know of any particularly good, bad or ugly dealings that you have had with clients recently. I will use the client's name, but I won't use your name if you don't want me to. Anonymous submissions will not be considered. Please include contact information for yourself and for the client.Leftovers
It doesn't matter if you're from a big city or a rural area. Business is business everywhere.
|Copyright © 2002-2016 Mark Loundy All Rights Reserved|